Monday, August 29, 2011

Rise of the Planet of the Apes

I will start by saying I feel completely scarred by Rise of the Planet of the Apes. If you have pets/animals and love them, just don’t go see this film. I think I had more “fun” watching Schindler’s List! That isn’t to say it’s a bad film, but boy oh boy…*long exhalation*. Before I get ahead of myself, let me see if I can break it down. Note: I really hate writing the summary part of my reviews (and maybe it shows), so if you’d like a proper one, you might want to look elsewhere, but here goes nothing:

James Franco plays Will Rodman, a geneticist working for a huge pharmaceutical company in San Francisco who is working on a miracle drug to cure Alzheimer’s; something that is very personal to him. This cure involves the brain regrowing damaged cells. Drug trials on chimpanzees are underway and there are complications. These complications lead him to taking home one-day old  chimp Cesar for just a couple days. But Cesar shows signs of enhanced intelligence because his mother had been a test subject and had passed some special genes onto him in the womb. Those couple days turn into years as Cesar grows into  becoming  part son, part pet and part time patient of Rodman (and his father, played by John Lithgow). But we all know this is going to end badly and so it does and tragically, Cesar is separated from Will and is sent to a primate center (but not the good kind unfortunately). Cesar’s treatment in the center, his heart break over being “abandoned” by Will and seeing the state of his fellow apes forever changes Cesar. At first broken down, he finds new resolve. And these changes in him lead to changes in his fellow ape “prisoners” and as the title (and previews) show, they do indeed rise up.


I did not enjoy this film. I repeat, there was ZERO enjoyment. However, that isn’t to say it wasn’t both fascinating and thrilling. What I found fascinating was watching Cesar’s transformation (through more than a few tears on my part) and how he and the other apes began to form a cohesive unit, teaching each other, cooperating and strategizing on how to change their situation. Their hard-fought rising up against the system (and the bully primate-center owners) brings about the thrills as you can’t help but cheer them on. Watching Cesar, played by Andy Serkis (who wowed as Gollum in Lord of the Rings) is impressive; he once again brings life and emotion to a CGI special effect. Also watching the swarms of apes (including mountain gorillas and orangutans) as they break out of confinement and race to reach the redwood forests of northern California is suspenseful and definitely exciting.


I’m not sure if I can actually recommend this film but you may find this helpful: in my opinion there are 3 types of people who shouldn’t see this film:

1. Animal lovers – I reckon donations to PETA and animal adoptions will be up once folks watch this film. Harrowing, heart-breaking and infuriating, I suspect anyone who loves animals will find this nowhere near “enjoyable” to watch. Engrossing, yes. Enjoyable, no way.

2. Animal haters – For this group of cold-hearted folks (Michael Vick, I’m looking at you), you may be completely unaffected by what normal, warm-blooded people find difficult to watch. You may even secretly like what these apes have to go through but when the apes rise up and get their own back, YOU, my friend, will be squirming in your seats wondering if Karma really does exist (by the way it does and you're screwed). 

3. People who expect actors to act – I’m no expert but let me tell you, the acting was pre-e-e-e-e-tty lame. Excuse me while I direct the next sentence to James Franco directly:, “Dear James, I think you must’ve been on the same drug cocktail during the making of this film that you were during this year’s Academy Awards. You registered no emotion in either face or voice. You were sleep walking!”  In addition Freida Pinto could only look pretty (it’s not her fault, she just had nothing to do) and James Lithgow was completely wasted as Franco’s Alzheimer-stricken father.

So if you somehow are not in any of these categories, then I encourage you to go see Rise of the Planet of The Apes and let me know how you find it. In fact, even if you ignore my warnings and go see it (at your own peril), please also let me know what you think and if I can appropriately respond with, “I told ya so.”


.

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Cowboys and Aliens

I tell you what, when I buy a ticket for a Steven Spielberg/Jon Favreau film, I suffer from the worst, highest expectations. It has to be awesome, right? It has to knock my socks off and make me want to go see it again, right? RIGHT? Well...this film shows me two things: one -I must address my magical thinking that creates such ridiculously high expectations (my shrink and I are hard work at that one) and two - even the greatest movie-making combo sometimes fall short of the "awesome" level and end up in the "quite good" one.

Set in a small, frontier town of New Mexico, Cowboys and Aliens tells a typical story of cowboys (good guys, bad guys and everything in between) and the not so typical story of the appearance of aliens who are snatching up the humans for who knows what purpose. Putting (many) differences and violence aside, the cowboys (and some Indians) band together to try to fight the aliens and save their kin who were snatched away. The cowboy alliance, who are desperately under-armed against alien technology, do have a couple things going from them. First, they have Daniel Craig. Suffering from amnesia, he is our unlikely hero who has his own unique weapon against the invaders. And secondly, there's also someone among the cowboy group who has a unique perspective and talent. Armed with guns, horses and terrible hygiene (more on that later), they attempt to not only survive the alien invaders, but perhaps even eradicate them.

I enjoyed the film, I didn't wish for my money back but it didn't knock my socks off. If you like cowboy films or alien films, I think this is a good choice for you.  Here are a few other observations that came to mind while watching Cowboys and Aliens:

Not so hot Daniel Craig
Daniel Craig is "sexy-ugly" (emphasis on ugly)!
I'd be so curious to know if anyone else watching this movie secretly wondered, "Wait, has Daniel Craig always looked like this? Has he always been this...ugly?" I know what you're thinking and I loved him in Casino Royale too. But he looks gaunt, quite slight (though very well cut; he works out a lot) and frankly kinda unattractive. However, when he's walking around the desert kicking ass like he does in this film, he exudes sexy! In the next film of his I watch, it'll be interesting to see what I think of him then.

Aliens are scary
If you think about it, Director Jon Favreau had a challenge on this film. How do you create awesome action scenes when you're pitting aliens with superb technology against cowboys with...colts and sticks of dynamite? Did he overcome this challenge? Well in my mind he did (only just) by making the aliens so awful to look at and watch. Instead of ass-kicking action scenes where lots of stuff blows up, I felt regularly terrified for these mere mortals who are trying any which way to make a decent stand against the gruesome invaders.

Couldn't find pics of aliens online so their ship will have to do


Can you say grubby?
Good god, get these people some soap on a rope!
Ohhhhh the grime. Like any true cowboy film, these are folks with some real hygiene challenges. The caked on dirt, blood and sweat (and other things I hasten to add) are quite vile to see. Thank goodness movie theater technology doesn't include odor-emissions (unless you're sat next to a 14 year old boy) because just seeing the levels of dirt was quite disgusting! Of all the characters, there's one who never looks dirty...Olivia Wilde's character. She always looks as clean and fresh as newly washed linen.

All in all, I enjoyed this film. I liked the casting (heavy hitters like Harrison Ford & Sam Rockwell do well with what they're given), the special effects did the trick (see scary aliens above) and most of all, I appreciated the originality of the premise. having said all of that, you'd probably be just as well waiting to rent it on DVD.

Harrison Ford & Sam Rockwell

What do you think, have you seen it? Did it bowl you over or just moderately entertain you?

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Captain America

It's still (barely) summer here in England and with Summer comes big, Hollywood action movies! This week, I share my views on Captain America with entertainment news website Geno's World. To read about what I thought of this film, including my thoughts on its subtle patriotism, Hugo Weaving being awesome, montage silliness and rife stereotypes, click HERE to read my full review.

Sunday, July 10, 2011

Falling Skies

Falling Skies recently debuted in the UK and at least for my part was eagerly anticipated. How engaging was it? How interesting and gripping? Well to give you an idea of the scope of its impact, while watching the 60 minute premier, I did the following things: fed my dog, balanced my checking account, retweeted links about kittens and baby giraffes, answered some work email, looked through the next week’s TV guide for interesting finds and began writing a review of something entirely different. This is what you would call a FAILURE in getting my interest.

Set in post alien invasion where all the human armies were decimated and capital cities obliterated, humans are forced to fight guerilla style for their survival against the badass aliens and their machinery. Not everyone confronted by aliens dies, some get a spinal back brace made of metals and alien parts that seem to make them hypnotized (and forced removal ends in death). The humans have to stay on the move, looking for supplies and trying to get a fighting advantage. The show follows Professor Tom Mason (played by ER alum Noah Wyle) who is a bookworm and has studied war tactics throughout the millennia. He and his 2 (or is it 3?) sons as well as his brother are all that’s left of their family.

Sounds promising, right? So where did it fall short? Let’s have a look at three ways Falling Skies just doesn’t cut the mustard.

1. Cliché Character Central
The central character (Wyle) is the only character remotely interesting. As for the rest, the appearance of these typical cliché characters had me rolling my eyes. Among others, there was the hothead brother, the crusty and hard-nosed military leader, a smart yet pretty young female doctor, smart-ass kids, a kind older couple (how did they outrun the aliens?) who drive their campervan and are surrogate grandparents. Don’t forget the 2 young  black guys who bring a bit of urban hip-hop to the dialogue (this stereotype is rather disturbing, kind of like those two Transformers who are “down” with the urban scene). If the characters are simply carbon-copies of countless programs before it, you lose credibility, at least with me.

2. Anyone else having a bad case of déjà vu?
I love a good sci-fi program, one where there are cool weapons, excellent special effects and where lots of sh&t blows up, but when it comes to Falling Skies, I’ve seen this allllll before. It’s an uninspired remix of War of the Worlds, Independence Day and The Walking Dead. 


3. Can anything ever come of this?
This point of disappointment isn’t actually the fault of Falling Skies. It’s fatigue…mine to be exact. As in the aforementioned point, I love these kinds of shows but at some stage I realize there can never be any satisfaction. The aliens can never be beaten (until final episode). So what’s the point, I wonder? Why do I want to go through the stress every week of the grim decimation of the human race when I know it’ll be the same thing every week? It’s the same with The Walking Dead (though that show has developed characters who make it worth watching, at least the 1st season), V (I really liked this show until I realized it’s the same damn thing every week). Note: only Battlestar Gallactica managed to avoid this fate. I tuned in every week for that show because of the amazing writing and deeper themes despite the stress of it.



Although Falling Skies may remain on the DVR schedule (I have to have something on while I’m writing for my blog, cleaning the house or paying bills), I’m afraid it will never really hold my interest or make me really care what happens.

Bridesmaids

If you're like me, you've heard all the great buzz about this movie, that it's one of the funniest movies of the year while having some touching moments. You and your girlfriends (or your mother in my case) or even in some cases your boyfriend skip off to the cinema to lots of laughter. And for the record, there was laughter, smiles and chuckles but to be honest, it wasn't what I expected and it was a tad discombobulating for me! So to save you from the same discombobulation (how many times can "discombobulate" be legitimately used in one review, I ask myself?), I'm here to help. Therefore, I'm sharing with you:

3 Things You Should Know Before Seeing Bridesmaids

1. Touchy-feely-stinky-gross
Our protagonist, Annie (brilliantly played by Kristen Wiig), is having some major issues in her life. Work, love, money, sex...let's just say Annie is not having a good time of it. However, her friendship with her best friend Lillian is the most meaningful thing in Annie's life as the movie begins. Their initial scenes in the cafe (where the actors did a lot of improvisation I’ve read) are truly charming and very natural - very much how two girlfriends talk. Lillian's getting married and Annie is to be the maid of honour. "Awww, this is exactly what I hoped this movie would be", I remember thinking. Cue not so much later some shocking scenes of toilet humour usually reserved for the likes of The Hangover! Vomit, sweat, explosive diarrhea...just right there in your face! Had the movie suddenly turned into Jackass 3D? As someone who lives in Britain, I embrace toilet humour; we just love laughing at our bowel movements, farts and any other manner of gross things. Still, if you are expecting this movie to be all sentiment and sweet laughter, think again! They mix it up, big time!

Oh dear, what's happening here?

2. I’m laughing! No, I’m crying!
Just last night a friend of mine told me she was going to see the movie that evening. She'd been struggling with a few things and was ready for a real laugh, a real pick-me-up. My response was, "Oooooooookay....well...yes...it is a very entertaining movie and quite funny. I chuckled, snorted and out-right laughed many times. BUT for the record, my heart hurt through most of it!" Why was this, you ask?

Watching Annie's life continue to break down and fall apart: the humiliation, the loneliness, the lack of self-respect (and therefore lack of respect shown her), the loss of her security, the change in her friendship with Lillian (the bride), her progress into her own rock-bottom was painful to watch! But if I'd known that going in, it wouldn't have bothered me so much. But like my dear, sweet, innocent friend last night, she wanted a movie to help her escape from her own pain, but my experience was it resonated deep within me (I think most women will identify with Annie on some deep level). So rather than relieving me of the burden of myself, it focused in on my own "issues". Right...I will now take a break from writing this review to call my shrink to make an urgent appointment, be with you in a sec...okay, appointment made...normalcy here I come...riiiiight?

Best friends since childhood Annie & Lillian
3. One day at a time
Now, the third thing is noooo biggy. I suppose you could argue that this really isn't anything you need to know before seeing the movie. But why not take a moment to let you know something that you may question when you watch Bridesmaids, that you may say, "Hmmm, is that so?" so I will declare it now in this review to live on forever (or until my Go Daddy domain expires). Ready? Here is is: AA is for alcoholics as in alcoholics who have actually drunk alcoholically. You'll know what I mean when you watch it.


So there you have it. Thanks to this insightful and not at all self-indulgent review, you can now go forth and watch Bridesmaids and it'll be everything you want it to be at more because I will have prepared you for the things that discombobulated me (that's 4 times I've used it for those of you counting as we go) . In fact, this review is soooooo useful I may just go and see Bridesmaids again and then I can hopefully report back to my psychiatrist how much less it hurt my soul the second time.

What do you think, have you seen it? Was it what you expected? Do you agree/disagree?

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Wallander

Perusing the recorded TV programs on my DVR says a lot about my interests and some might say my mental health. But I make no apologies! I like what I like and that's that. However, there are a few things you might glean from seeing what I record on a week to week basis:   First of all, I will never apologize for my love of Charmed and my desire to watch reruns (traditionally after work with a cup of tea). Secondly, I do have a morbid curiosity for the macabre (is that a redundant statement?) as evidenced by Criminal Minds, Silent Witness and Forensic Files. Thirdly, I love crime-dramas. When I find a tense and unpredictable crime-drama that pulls me in (like The Killing earlier this year I was absolutely crazy about or my current enjoyment of The Shadow Line), I am so excited! And right up there on my list of, "Oh goody, I can't wait to watch this week's episode" shows is the Swedish detective series Wallander.

Wallander, based on novels written by Henning Mankell, which have been going strong for twenty years, follows Detective Kurt Wallander, who while a brilliant detective, is not exactly a happy camper. Prone to anger, depression and ill-health, he is an unlikely protagonist as he and the police department tackle all manner of serious crimes in Malmo, a seaside Swedish city in the southern province of Skåne. More details about the history of him and the show can be found online but here are 3 of the numerous reasons why I love Wallander and always look forward to it!

1. Moody Tension
I love the atmosphere the producers create week in and week out. The music, lighting and pace all add to a kind of sad but not hopeless mood. Each story unfolds as the tension builds like a slow but steady spring. Kurt and his team, including the lead prosecutor (who happens to be a strong and sexy woman who is in fact his superior which adds to the tension) do what seems like "real" policework. It's not all flash and technology but a lot of the mundane, looking for a crack in the case (which always comes). Wallander is a tortured soul and actor Krister Henriksson is absolutely brilliant walking the fine line showing his obvious faults but leaving us in no doubt he's our hero.

2. Juissi
Wallander loves his dog, Juissi. Juissi, a chocolate lab, often accompanies Kurt to work and Kurt is his "softest" when talking to Juissi, walking him or referring to him (could be true for all of us). It may not sound like a big deal but for a lonely workaholic like Kurt Wallander, his dutiful companion Juissi is actually key in forming the character which we come to love. Note: the Kenneth Brannagh version does not have a dog and that is unfortunate!



3. Subtitles
They don't scare me! Swedish is a fascinating-sounding language (a lot more depth than the Swedish chef from the Muppet Show would make you believe). I am utterly intrigued by the sounds of their language, of the words that are the same or similar in English and matching up words to the subtitles. When characters are having a heated argument, I swear to you, it's even MORE interesting that it's in Swedish!

If you're only able to watch the BBC version (produced by and starring Kenneth Brannagh), then it's a very worthy attempt and you probably won't be disappointed. I've seen a few episodes and it manages to achieve the melancholy atmosphere. The plot lines succeed as they're tried and tested in the books and Swedish TV show. But for my money, the original is much better. I haven't nearly seen them all and hope BBC continues to air the show, repeats and all. And if they do, Wallander will always be found in my DVR list!

Sunday, April 3, 2011

Comic Books to the Big Screen - Part 3: Captain America

In the 3rd and final part of guest contributor Devin Rankin's series on the ins and outs of comic book heroes who are becoming Hollywood blockbusters (click HERE to read Part 2: The Green Lantern) Devin looks at Captain America:

 Captain America, The First Avenger
Releasing July 22 2011 in the US.
( just called “The First Avenger” outside of the US)
 
Captain America was created in 1941 by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby who were working for the company that would later become Marvel Comics.  Captain America was the perfect human specimen, wearing a costume inspired by a US flag and fighting the evil forces that opposed America.

In that first story, Steve Rogers is a weak and sickly guy who has been picked on all his life.  But he loves his country and tries to sign up for the Army.  The Army classes him as 4F and they reject him.  As he pleads with the recruitment officer, an Army general who has been looking for a test subject for an experiment overhears him.  Steve agrees to do anything for his country and soon he is being injected with the Super Soldier serum and placed into a chamber to be exposed to a new type of radiation.  When he steps out, he has the body of a Greek God.   Not superhuman exactly.  But the quickest, strongest human possible.  The scientist who invented the process (who looks a lot like Einstein) is killed by a spy and the equipment destroyed so Steve Rogers is the only one to undergo the process (because no one ever wrote anything down back then I guess).

The Army designs a uniform for him, gives him a shield and uses him as a high visibility weapon against the German, Italian and Japanese forces, known as the Axis.  The first shield is kite shaped and just plain steel.   This shield was later replaced by a new round shield made of some indestructible metal.

Captain America Comics #1 (March 1941). Cover art by Joe Simon (inks and pencils) and Jack Kirby (pencils).

Just what the shield is made of is the source of many drunken geek debates.  Partly because Marvel has this habit of revising history by revealing “new” unknown elements of the story.  So originally some scientists were working on new metal alloys and accidently created a metal disk that was indestructible.  They were never able to replicate the results and so the disk was painted red, white, and blue and given to Captain America as a shield.  At different times, the shield has been said to have been made of (the fictional metal)  Adamantium and (the fictional metal) Vibranium or else an unknown steel alloy and Vibranium.    Adamantium being an indestructible metal and Vibranium being a metal that can absorb and reflect vibrations.  So is the shield Adamantium/Vibranium or some near Adamantium steel/Vibranium?  The real answer is that it is paper and ink, but among geeks, the debate rages on.

Captain America remained popular in the 40’s and early 50’s, fighting Nazis and Communists.  But by the mid 50’s, the comic was out of print.  Many comics stopped printing in the 50’s because they were under attack.  In the 50’s they were the targets of congressional hearings that were looking into the “damage” they did to the American youth.  Just like TV in the 60’s, video games in the 80’s and 90’s, and the Internet today.  Rather than defend themselves, most comic book companies stopped publishing the violent superhero, war, and horror stories and instead published stuff like Archie and Jughead or re-did classic books as comic books with an illustrated story.  This was also the time that the “Comic Code” stamp of approval came into being.  It was an attempt to self-censor the industry.  Similar to what the movie industry did when it was their turn to fall under the Eye of Sauron in the culture wars.

But by the 60’s, TV was taking all the heat as the source of juvenile moral corruption and comics started up again without much notice or outcry. Marvel was doing good business with their new line of heroes in the 60’s and then they started bringing back some of their older properties.  They wrote the story of the last days of Captain America in WWII.  It seems he was on a mission near the Arctic Circle to stop a new Nazi super weapon.  Cap was able to stop it, but in the process fell into the frigid waters and was presumed dead.    But he did not die of course.  Comic book heroes never really die.  He was just frozen and became part of an iceberg for 20 years until he was discovered and thawed and brought back to life in 1964.  He continued to fight some of his old enemies, like Zemo and Red Skull, and some new ones as well.  He also became the leader of the Avengers, a comic book team of superheroes.

The movie seems to follow along the lines of the comic book origin and will be mostly about WWII.  They have introduced Tony Stark’s dad, Howard Stark, and made him the guy who made the shield.  This seems to have been in the plot for years as the shield, or a mock up of it, can be seen in the background of both Iron Man movies.  They have changed the uniform to make it a bit more realistic and my guess is that the movie ends with some form of Cap’s death in the arctic.  Marvel has announced that the next movie to be made will be The Avengers, which will have Thor, Iron Man, and Captain America in the modern world.  So they seem to be following the broad outline laid down by the long running comic 40 years ago.

 
I have some high hopes for this movie.  I really enjoyed the Captain America stories growing up.  But the last two attempts to make a movie out of the story have really failed.  There was  a 1970’s made for TV movie that had Steve Roger’s son as Captain America.  And a 1980 movie that never saw release, but can be found around the Internet and sometimes on DVD if you look hard enough.  Both were bad, really bad.  Marvel seems to be taking time and effort to be sure its heroes are done right.   I hope the streak continues with this one.

Note from Valerie: Thank you to Devin Rankin for the time and effort in creating this series for What Valerie Thinks. Below is a bespoke portrait that was done of Devin AS Captain America. To everyone who knows Devin, he is, indeed, a real hero! 

 



Thursday, March 17, 2011

Comic Books to the Big Screen - Part 2: Green Lantern

In the second part of guest contributor Devin Rankin's series on the ins and outs of comic book heroes who are becoming Hollywood blockbusters (click HERE to read Part 1: Thor) Devin looks at Green Lantern:

Green Lantern
Releasing June 16th in US.

In the 1940’s, Allen Scott was the Green Lantern.  It was the Golden Age of comics and superhero comics were hot stuff.  In this version, Allen Scott had found a magical green lantern.  He made a ring out of a piece of the lantern and discovered that the ring gave him a number of fantastic abilities.  But the ring had to be charged every 24 hours by being in contact with the lantern and the ring did not work on anything wooden.  This green Lantern wore a red and green costume with a black and green cape.

Above art: Green Lantern's debut in All-American Comics#16 (July 1940).
Art by Sheldon Moldoff.

By the 1950’s superhero comics were out of fashion and Green Lantern stopped being published.  When they came back in around 1960, DC comics decided to re-invent most of its heroes.  They kept Superman and Batman largely the same.  But Green Lantern got a complete re-design, as did almost all the other heroes that DC owned.  This 1960 era is often called the Silver Age.

In this new version, the Green Lantern ring is a super high tech weapon for good.  A galaxy wide organization known as The Guardians have thousands of heroes known as Green Lanterns.  Each sector of space has its own hero who wears the ring.  Abin Sur is the Green Lantern for sector 2814, which includes earth.  He is injured in a battle and his space ship falls to earth.  As he dies, he has the ring find a new hero for sector 2814.  Someone who is honest and without fear.  The ring selects 2 people, Guy Gardner, and Hal Jorden.  Hal, a test pilot, is closer and ring goes to him.  Hal is reckless and impulsive.  But over time grows into the roll of a hero and goes on to become the leader of the Green Lantern Corps.

The ring is able to do just about anything (except keep Abin Sur from dying it would seem).  It allows Hal to fly, protects him with a force field and allows him to grab and move things at a distance.  It has to be charged by placing it in contact with its power source, a green lantern, and it has no power against anything yellow.  

While the ring is charging, it seems the wearer must recite this kinda silly rhyme:

“In the brightest day, in the blackest night, no evil shall escape my sight.  Let those who worship evil’s might, beware my power, Green Lantern’s Light.” That is why the posters for the movie have “In the brightest day, in the blackest night” printed in the corners.  A bit of a nod to the fan boys.

During the last 50 years or so, the Green Lantern comic has gone through a lot of ups and downs.  The writers have often changed things around, trying to spark some interest.  The writes have invented new characters to wear the ring.   The most notable are John Stewart, Kyle Rayner, and Jennifer-Lynn Hayden.   In the 80’s comics came under some criticism because all the heroes seemed to be white males.  The industry responded by making some new ethnic heroes, but also by putting new people in the roles of old heroes.  So far a while the ring went to John Stewart, an African American.  Then to Kyle Rayner, who’s father was Hispanic.   Jen Hayden wore a Green Lantern ring for a while, but went by the name Jade.  She has been the only female on earth to wear the ring.  But not, as it turns out, the only female Green Lantern.


Artwork for the cover of Green Lantern: Rebirth 6 (May 2005 DC Comics). Featuring (l to r) Guy Gardner, Kyle Rayner, Hal Jordan, John Stewart, and Kilowog. Art by Ethan Van Sciver.

From the early release publicity, the movie seems to go along with the 60’s comic book origin story with Hal Jorden being a test pilot who is given the ring by a dying Abin Sur. The bad guy for the movie seems to be Sinestro, a former Green Lantern who now wears a yellow power ring. (Geeky point that may not be in the movie:  Sinestro is Abin Sur’s brother in law as he was once married to Abin’s sister.)  They also seem to be keeping the theme of Hal growing into his new role. 

The movie looks good.  There is no way this could have been done before CGI special effects.  Green lantern is always forming giant green hands to grasp things or hit things and they just would not have looked right in the past.